The procedural flow laid out by the Calcutta High Court (2025 Guidelines Order) is clear: registration → examination on oath ...

All the above referred criminal revision applications are directed against the same impugned order dated 13-8-1998 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur whereby non-applicants/accused S.M.

Seized property refers to any item taken into police or court custody during the investigation of a crime because it is believed to have a connection with the alleged offense. Such property may ...

The guidelines framed by the High Court of Allahabad in the impugned judgment dated 13.06.2022 in Criminal Revision No. 1126 of 2022 vide paras 32 to 38, with regard to ‘Constitution of Family Welfare ...

From the above referred observations, it is evident that theterm ‘interlocutory order’ used in sub section 2 of Section 397 of Cr.P.C. covers the challenge made to the orders for bail. {Para 17} This ...

11. Reverting back to S.R. Sukumar (supra), it does not follow from the judgment that post-cognizance, no amendment can be allowed. In fact, a reading of the penultimate paragraph of the judgment ...

Bombay HC: Under which circumstances, order of disposal of property during pendency of criminal trial will be final order or interlocutory order?

Supreme Court Sets Aside Sentence Under Amended POCSO Provision : Constitutional Bar Against Retrospective Imposition Of Harsher Penalty Is Absolute ...

The correct position of law as laid down in Madhu Limaye (supra), thus, is that orders framing charges or refusing discharge are neither interlocutory nor final in nature and are therefore not ...

The Supreme Court in Jamatraj v. State of Maharashtra MANU/SC/0063/1967 : A.I.R. 1968 S.C. 178, while considering the sweep of Sec. 540. Cr.P.C. (Repealed Code) expressed itself: ...

When the court should allow or can refuse to allow questions at the time of cross-examination?